E-Learning Solutions for Special Needs Teaching

E-Learning solutions can provide student assessment, lesson plans, and more, and are available for teachers of special needs students.

There are many e-Learning solutions to help teachers with special needs education, including online student assessment tools, customizable lesson plans, and software programs to aid in the instruction of students’ basic life and social skills, as well as academics. What is e-Learning? It is any learning done using technological tools such as the Internet or software programs installed on a personal computer, as well as technology that can help with the delivery of information.

Using e-Learning solutions, teachers of students with special needs can help them learn at their own pace, and they can design lessons that are highly customized to meet their students’ needs. Using e-Learning tools, teachers can also help students with disabilities keep up with their schoolwork if they expect to be homebound. Finally, there are many e-Learning solutions for teachers who wish to further their own understanding of special education.

Electronic Assessment Tools, Lesson Plans and Educational Materials for Teachers

Before deciding on a curriculum for a special needs classroom, teachers will need to evaluate their students to determine their abilities for learning and current skill sets. Teachers can find many assessment tools online, some of which are free. For example, Yacapaca is a comprehensive collection of thousands of free online assessment quizzes. Other examples are the free dyslexia evaluation test provided by Ron Davis’ Reading Research Council, and a learning disability screening quiz at About.

Many sites also offer online lesson plans and teaching materials that are available for downloading. One example is the Unique Learning Systems website, which provides the option of a yearly subscription to teachers. With the subscription comes new monthly downloads of educational materials specifically designed for students with special needs and segregated into four separate age “bands”. The cost for a subscription is significant, but they do offer a free summer curriculum.

School Technology Integration Myths and Misconceptions

In 1983, the National Commission on Excellence in Education released the report, A Nation at Risk, that identified technology education as one of the solutions to regaining America's former leadership in industry and science. It also proclaimed technology as the solution to educational achievement gaps between low income and affluent communities. Though in 2001 No Child Left Behind renewed the push for more technology, the narrowing of the achievement gap has not been solved by the presence computer education due to inequities in how technology is taught and used in schools..

Original Hopes for Computers in Schools

According to Margolis's research of literature, reported in the book Stuck in the Shallow End, technology has been viewed as the solution to educational crises ranging from creating engaging curricula to closing the social equity gap. School districts, individual states, and the federal government have all devoted funds to making technology available to all students so they can learn basic computer skills and how to use technology for a variety of educational purposes.

Technology policies now include provisions for purchasing computers, wiring schools, maintaining technology staff, and technology integration throughout the curriculum. Elementary age students are taught keyboarding; middle and high school students take classes to learn how to use basic applications. Some high school students have access to specialized software in classes such as video production, electronics, graphic arts, and computer science. Margolis's research uncovers evidence that access to technology does not guarantee access to engaging curricula or a narrowing of the achievement gap.

How Technology Fails Some Students

It is a misconception that technology is a guaranteed method for creating engaging curricula. Margolis provides a glimpse of how often technology based lessons are frequently cut-and-paste or built upon following specific directions, and how rare it is to find technology classes where students are required to use higher order thinking skills or solve real-world problems. She includes in her book conversations with students who explain how uninteresting these classes can be and how they would welcome more of a challenge.

Margolis's work also shows that the view that technology will narrow the achievement gap is a myth. Frequently, low preforming schools, which are commonly found in low income area, feel pressured to provide more opportunities for students to improve test scores, resulting in schools adopting, “scripted, test-prep curriculum rather than the creative, problem-solving thinking skills required for the twenty-first century,” (p 125). Not all students in poor economic areas have access to computers at home; and, especially in cities and rural areas, may have long commute times and not be able to stay after school or arrive early to use the available technology. Furthermore, higher level computing classes which offer more than basic skill development, are not offered in many schools, and when they are these classes frequently are restricted to a small group of students.

Though technology has been pushed as the solution to engaging students and lessening the achievement gap, the myths and misconceptions behind this view are beginning to emerge. Margolis's book provides an intimate view into how technology is integrated into the curriculum of different schools and summarizes research that shows the potential is there, but changes still need to occur before technology can truly reduce the achievement gap.

Reference : Margolis, J. Stuck in the Shallow End. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

End-of-Course Evaluations - Creating Realistic Tools That Provide Objective Feedback

How are Evaluation Responses Treated ?

A trend of negative responses should trigger awareness that something may be wrong. This can be used to corroborate administrative evaluations of the instructor. The evaluation documents, however, must never be used as an instrument of fear and intimidation. They can be successfully used to alter teaching methodologies that might better conform to curricular goals.

Read on 

Often, student “comments” sections provide the richest feedback. If students universally hated a particular reading, it might be time to replace it. If the instructor did not employ technology or utilize on-line tools like Blackboard, instructors may wish to redesign instructional formats.

Updating Course Evaluations Regularly

Schools and institutions using the same evaluation tool from year to year fail to take into account changing student demographics. It is also a lazy way of advertising, “We have a system of end-of-course evaluations.” The evaluation document must be subject to yearly review by appropriate institutional committees in order to retain integrity and objectivity. Only then will the evaluation become a useful barometer for instructors and department heads.